ALF Amicus Brief Archive

ALF amicus briefs, archived in reverse chronological order and by mission area, are summarized and accessible below. For more information about ALF’s Amicus Curiae Program, please contact our Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Larry Ebner.

Supreme Court Should Adopt Practical, Real-World View of FAA “Transportation Workers” Exemption

Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock (24-935) (merits)

Free Enterprise
December 11, 2025
ALF Urges Supreme Court To Hold That Exxon Mobil Corporation Can Seek Compensation For Castro-Confiscated Business Property

Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporacion Cimex, S.A. (Cuba) (24-699) (merits)

Free Enterprise, Property Rights
December 1, 2025
ALF Urges Supreme Court To Reaffirm That Governmental Appropriations of Water Rights Are Per Se, Physical Takings of Compensable Property

United Water Conservation District v. United States (25-523) (petition)

Property Rights
November 28, 2025
ALF Argues That Federal Law Precludes Tort Suits Against U.S. Military “Battlefield Contractors”

Hencely v. Fluor Corporation, et al. (24-924) (Supreme Court) (merits)

September 22, 2025
Joint Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Reverse Narrow Reading Of Federal-Officer Removal Statute

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish (24-813) (Supreme Court) (merits)

Free Enterprise
September 15, 2025
ALF Urges Supreme Court To Decide Whether Federal Law Precludes Climate-Change Tort Suits

Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado (25-170) (Supreme Court) (petition)

Free Enterprise, Sound Science
September 11, 2025
ALF & FDCC Argue That Federal Law Preempts Climate-Change Tort Suits

Mayor & City of Baltimore v. B.P. P.L.C., et al. (Maryland Supreme Court) (SCM-REG-0011-2025)

Free Enterprise, Sound Science
July 11, 2025
ALF Amicus Brief Argues That Post-Judgment Forum Shopping Undermines Civil Justice

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. v. Palmquist (24-724) (Supreme Court) (merits)

Civil Justice, Sound Science
July 2, 2025
ALF Urges Ninth Circuit To Adopt “Significant Purpose” Test For Applying Attorney-Client Privilege To Multi-Purpose Corporate Communications

Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. (25-2935) (Ninth Circuit)

California
July 1, 2025
Scroll to Top